Let's Talk
The word “SKILLCYCLE” in bold dark letters overlays a colorful circular design made of layered paper-like rings in pink, yellow, blue, and purple on a black background.
The word “SKILLCYCLE” in bold dark letters overlays a colorful circular design made of layered paper-like rings in pink, yellow, blue, and purple on a black background.

AI in Performance Reviews: Balancing Technology and Human Insight in 2025

October 15th, 2025 – By Rebecca Taylor, CCO and Co-founder

AI enhances performance reviews by automating admin work and surfacing data-driven insights, while people provide context, empathy, and final judgment. If you are exploring how to use AI for performance review, think of it as a co-pilot. Let AI tools for performance reviews handle data aggregation, goal tracking, and pattern recognition, then managers focus on meaningful conversations and personalized development planning. This is the sweet spot for using AI for performance reviews without losing the human touch.

In practice, teams that use AI for performance review can quickly spot skill gaps, compare progress across cycles, and prepare fair, consistent feedback. Start simple with AI for performance reviews to summarize notes and calibrate ratings, then expand to coaching prompts and growth plans. Whether you say AI for performance review or ai for performance reviews, the goal is the same. Treat the system as assistive, not authoritative.

Discover how Aida uses the power of AI to create personalized development plans that drive business outcomes. It shows a practical path to adopt ai tools for performance reviews while keeping managers in control.

Let’s Break it Down:

  • What Are the Risks of Fully Automated Performance Reviews?
  • How to Balance AI Efficiency with Personalized Feedback?
  • Which Performance Review Tasks Should AI Handle vs. Humans?
  • How to Train Managers to Work WITH AI Tools?
  • What’s the ROI Timeline for AI-Enhanced Reviews?

Understanding AI’s Role & Impact

The Shift from Annual Reviews to Continuous Feedback

Many organizations are retiring once-a-year reviews in favor of continuous feedback. Recent benchmarking shows 41% of organizations now use continuous-feedback systems, with reports of better retention and as much as 340% ROI within 18 months when the model is implemented well. Pair this with more frequent 1:1s and goal check-ins to keep coaching in the flow of work. If you are exploring ai for performance reviews, continuous feedback gives AI more timely data to summarize and surface patterns for managers.

AI’s Contributions to Accuracy and Objectivity

AI can reduce administrative time by collecting evidence from goals, projects, and notes, then generating draft summaries and calibration views. These ai tools for performance reviews help standardize criteria and highlight inconsistencies that signal potential bias. With proper guardrails, AI can support fairer, data-driven assessments while managers retain final judgment. Treat the system as a co-pilot and document governance to manage risk and transparency.

Effects on Engagement and Development

Traditional review processes leave many managers and employees dissatisfied, which hurts engagement and growth. Gallup reports only 22% of employees strongly agree their review process is fair and transparent, and other research has long noted widespread manager frustration with legacy systems. By using AI for performance reviews within a continuous model, teams can deliver real-time coaching prompts, pinpoint skill gaps, and suggest personalized learning plans, turning reviews into forward-looking development. If you want to use AI for performance review thoughtfully, start with light use cases like summary drafts and strengths highlights, then expand to tailored upskilling paths.

What Are the Risks of Fully Automated Performance Reviews?

Fully automated performance reviews pose three critical risks that can damage employee trust and company culture:

    1. Loss of Context and Nuance: While AI excels at processing quantitative data, it struggles with capturing situational context. Research by MIT Sloan Management Review highlights that 67% of employees feel misunderstood when evaluated through purely algorithmic means. Human managers offer better understanding of critical factors like family leave or teamwork contributions, which AI might overlook.

    2. Erosion of Manager-Employee Relationships: Performance conversations foster trust and psychological safety. Relying solely on AI for these interactions can cause managers to miss chances to:
      • Understand employee aspirations
      • Address concerns before they grow
      • Build rapport that enhances engagement

    3. Legal and Ethical Vulnerabilities: The EEOC cautions that automated systems may inadvertently discriminate. Without human oversight, AI risks penalizing employees for factors beyond their control or reinforcing existing biases in performance data.

How to Balance AI Efficiency with Personalized Feedback?

The optimal approach leverages AI to supplement, but not supplant human judgment:

AI Handles the Heavy Lifting
  • Compiles data from various performance sources
  • Detects patterns and trends
  • Creates initial discussion points for managers
  • Monitors goal progress automatically

Humans Provide the Heart
  • Interpret data within the right context
  • Offer empathetic feedback
  • Personalize development plans
  • Make conclusive evaluation decisions

According to Deloitte’s Human Capital Trends report, companies using this hybrid model enjoyed a 23% uptick in employee satisfaction with performance reviews, compared to systems that are entirely manual or automated.

Which Performance Review Tasks Should AI Handle vs. Humans?

Task
Why AI Excels
Human Oversight Needed

360 feedback collection

Increases response rates by 40% through smart reminders

Review for inappropriate comments

Goal tracking

Real-time updates

Adapt goals based on shifting priorities

Performance pattern analysis

Identifies trends humans may miss

Ensure findings are logical

Meeting note summaries 

Captures details accurately and objectively

Ensure accuracy and context
Human Essential Tasks

  • Final performance ratings
  • Career development dialogues
  • Delivery of difficult feedback
  • Decisions on promotions and compensation
  • Assessment of cultural alignment and values

How to Train Managers to Work WITH AI Tools?

For successful AI integration, managers should shift their perspective from “AI will replace me” to “AI will empower me.” Here’s a framework to facilitate this transition:
Week 1-2: Foundation Building

  • Demonstrate how AI saves 5-7 hours per review cycle
  • Showcase real-world AI-generated insights
  • Directly address job security concerns

Week 3-4: Hands-On Practice

  • Encourage managers to practice interpreting AI recommendations
  • Simulate using AI insights in conversations
  • Teach them to recognize and rectify AI errors

Ongoing: Reinforcement

  • Schedule monthly forums for managers to share best practices
  • Quarterly updates on new AI features
  • Reward managers who excel at collaborating with AI

Stanford’s Human-Centered AI Institute underscores viewing AI as a “decision support tool, not a decision-making tool.”

What's the ROI Timeline for AI-Enhanced Reviews?

Insights from mid-market companies (75-1000 employees) indicate:

Time
Expected ROI
Focus

Months 1-3: Implementation & Learning

-15% due to initial investment and training time

Adoption and process refinement

Months 4-6: Efficiency Gains

+25% from time savings alone

Managers report a 40% reduction in time spent on administrative tasks

Months 7-12: Full Value Realization

+110% from combined gains
  • Lower turnover rates (employees feel heard)
  • Enhanced performance due to frequent feedback
  • Increased engagement (managers have time for coaching)
Compiled from SkillCycle data and supported by

AI-Powered Reviews for Remote and Hybrid Teams

Remote and hybrid work is now the norm. Surveys indicate 62% of employees expect their employers to allow remote work going forward, and Microsoft’s Work Trend Index reports 75% of global knowledge workers already use AI at work. That is the perfect setup for ai for performance reviews that support asynchronous feedback, virtual check-ins, and collaboration across time zones. 

Here is how to make it work in practice:

  • Asynchronous feedback. Use ai tools for performance reviews to summarize goal updates, pull highlights from project threads, and flag coaching moments that managers can review on their schedule. This keeps momentum without waiting for a meeting.
  • Virtual check-ins. Pair short video or chat touchpoints with AI summaries so both sides arrive prepared. If you are using AI for performance reviews, let the system propose questions based on recent work and sentiment.
  • Shared evidence hub. Centralize notes, wins, and artifacts. AI can tag themes and detect gaps, while people add context and judgment. This is a practical way to use AI for performance review without losing the human conversation.

 Future of AI in Performance Reviews: 2025 and Beyond

Expect three shifts to accelerate:

  1. Continuous, skills-first reviews. AI will map work to skills, recommend micro-goals, and nudge timely feedback. That makes how to use AI for performance review less about forms and more about weekly improvement.
  2. Bias checks and calibration. Systems will highlight rating drift and compare similar roles to reduce inequities, while managers remain the final decision-makers. Early research shows AI can help standardize inputs and surface inconsistencies. 
  3. Stronger governance. With widespread AI use at work, companies will formalize policies for accuracy, privacy, and transparency so ai for performance reviews stays fair and defensible. 

Conclusion

AI should be a co-pilot, not a replacement. Let it handle collection, summarization, and pattern recognition, then keep people in charge of context, empathy, and development planning. Teams that use AI for performance review inside a continuous feedback rhythm will save time, raise quality, and give employees clearer growth paths. The winning formula is simple: clear goals, frequent check-ins, and thoughtful use of ai tools for performance reviews that make every conversation more informed.

FAQ

Can you use ChatGPT for performance review?

Yes, with clear guardrails. Use ChatGPT to draft summaries, structure feedback, and suggest development ideas, then have managers edit for accuracy and tone. Treat it as assistive and keep sensitive data within approved, enterprise tools. Microsoft’s research shows most knowledge workers already use AI at work, which is why governance and review are essential.

How is AI used in performance evaluation?

AI aggregates evidence from goals, projects, and feedback, then generates draft reports and calibration views. Done well, ai for performance reviews reduces admin time and highlights patterns managers might miss. Keep humans accountable for the final rating and the coaching plan.

How do companies ensure AI-generated feedback is unbiased?

Start with transparent criteria, train managers on rating standards, and use AI to flag anomalies across comparable roles. Document data sources and regularly audit outcomes by demographic group. Legal and research guidance warns that biased training data can amplify discrimination risks, so periodic audits and explainability are non-negotiable.

What are the privacy concerns with AI in performance reviews?

Two big ones are data security and “shadow AI.” Employees often adopt consumer tools without approval, raising privacy and IP risks. Provide sanctioned options, clear do-not-paste rules, and access controls so work data stays protected. Recent reports highlight widespread use of unapproved AI tools at work, which underscores the need for policy and training.

Can AI fully replace human managers in evaluations?

No. AI can draft, compare, and surface insights, but managers provide judgment, empathy, and context. The best results come from using AI for performance reviews as decision support while people own the conversation, ratings, and development follow-through.

TL;DR

  • AI can enhance, but not replace human judgment in performance reviews

  • Use AI for data efficiency; rely on humans for context and connection

  • Expect a 3-6 month period to see positive ROI

  • Train managers to be AI collaborators, not just users

  • Maintain human oversight for legal and ethical compliance
A person with curly dark hair and wearing a black, off-the-shoulder top smiles at the camera, exuding confidence. Behind them is a plain, light-colored wall. Their radiant expression suggests theyve mastered the SkillCycle on I Hate it Here.

About the Author

Rebecca brings her years of experience in the HR and People space to SkillCycle as the first official employee and Co-founder. Throughout her 10 years in HR, she developed and spearheaded People strategies that made her companies successful and protected their most valuable asset – the people. Her goal is to empower people to invest in themselves and their teams, to increase employee engagement, retention, and performance.

Want to implement AI-enhanced performance reviews that keep the human element front and center?
Let's Talk

Featured

Subscribe to our newsletter

View more from our People Ops Library

The SkillCYcle Logo

26 Broadway
3rd Floor
New York, NY 10004

Linkedin Vimeo
Black text on white background reads Inc. 5000 in bold, with Inc. above the number 5000.

Details